646f9e108c After a nuclear war, society breaks down into two groups, the evil Euraks and the rebel Federation. A mercenary named Parsifal is hired by the Federation to infiltrate New York City, which is controlled by the Euraks, to rescue the only fertile woman left on Earth. Despite being a huge fan of cult and B-Movies and even though I really wanted and tried hard to enjoy this, I&#39;m afraid that I&#39;m going to have to go against the general tide of opinionregards this film.<br/><br/>The ever likable Michael Sopkiw, who&#39;s career in B-movies was admittedly brief but so very fondly remembered, appears herea sort of Mad Max/Snake Plissken type of guy who is coerced into rescuing the last fertile woman on earth from within the hell hole that has become Manhattan Island.<br/><br/>Cue lots of fights, sludging through rat infested sewers, getting captured about every five minutes (!) a healthy splashing of gore and the appearance of perennial B-Movie fave big George Eastmana simian character called &#39;Big Ape&#39; and hey presto - you have what on paper at least sounds like a great movie…..<br/><br/>On paper perhaps……<br/><br/>To be fair, the movie isn&#39;t at all bad by any means and even boasts some pretty decent production values in fact, but sadly it just failed to enthral me.<br/><br/>The biggest problem I had with this is that the action scenes are for the most part handled with very little flair. Added to this, the best scene in the entire movie (for me at least) was actually at the very beginning when our hero is shown banger racing in a heavily armoured car. Needless to say, after such an intro the remaining 80 or so minutes of the movie seemed pale in comparison.<br/><br/>Still,previously mentioned, the overall look of the film is very commendable indeed (bar one or two instances of very dodgy model work) and there&#39;s some great gross out moments (including one excellent head bashing scene!)<br/><br/>I&#39;m tempted to deduct another point from this film however, due to the all too common and sad trend of some Italian genre movies of the time that regretfully rears it&#39;s ugly head here - genuine animal cruelty/killing. In this case we are &#39;treated&#39; to a display of some rats getting speared. Such a disgusting trend ostensibly stemmed from the cannibal themed movies of the same periodwere pioneered by directors Umberto Lenzi and Ruggero Deodato - both of whom were more than capable of producing highly enjoyable films without having to resort to such repulsive, cheap shock tactics.<br/><br/>Would you believe that I have actually spoken to people who have tried to justify such barbaric acts &#39;for the sake of art&#39;&#39;?! I&#39;ve also spoken to various other cretinous wretches who seem to be under the misguided impression that watching such acts of cruelty in films somehow makes them more &#39;macho&#39;it logically denotes that &#39;they can take anything&#39; (!!!!)<br/><br/>Still back to the film in question…..overall, whilst not unwatchable by any stretch of the imagination, After The Fall Of New York, for me, distinctly lacked enough intriguing scenes to raise it above the average mark.<br/><br/>My advice is, if you&#39;re into the genre then watch it by all means, it does have a hefty fan base, however for much more enjoyment value, check out the far superior film it is copied - erm…I mean inspired from, Escape From New York. 2019: After the Fall of New York (1983)<br/><br/>* 1/2 (out of 4) <br/><br/>During Italy&#39;s &quot;trash boom&quot;, each and every film from America that was popular would eventually be &quot;reinmagined&quot; but in a lower form. Take this film where we get a semi-remake of John Carpenter&#39;s ESCAPE FROM NEW YORK and needless to say, this here isn&#39;t quitegood. Twenty years after a nuclear apocalypse, three men are sent into New York where they must find the last fertile woman and bring her out so that civilization can start over. Making it through New York isn&#39;t going to be easywe got several bad guys, several ugly guys and a giant ape man (George Eastman). We can start off by stating the obvious in that Martino isn&#39;t Carpenter and Michael Sopkiw isn&#39;t Kurt Russell. With that said, this is still a pretty poor movie on all levels and in the end I was really disappointed because a lot of times these re-imagined films are decent for a few good laughs. That&#39;s not the case here because by the thirty-minute mark I was bored out of my mind and the final hour really dragged its feet so badly that the film just crashed and burned. I think the biggest problem is the budget. The horror or giallo films could get away with a low budget but I think that&#39;s a lot harder to do when it comes to futuristic action films. The action scenes are all incredibly cheap and they come off very fake looking. The post-apocalyptic world also looks very fake and especially the &quot;burnt down&quot; NYC at the start of the film. These are two things that you don&#39;t need a big budget for, just look at ESCAPE FROM NEW YORK but you need someone behind the camera to pull it off. Martino has made some good films throughout his career but this here isn&#39;t one of them. I think he has a hard time putting everything togetherthe film really loses focus of its (limited) story and goes off in all sorts of directions. Another major problem is that Sopkiw is just boring in the lead and doesn&#39;t make for a good character. The supporting cast isn&#39;t any better and that includes cult favorite Eastman.
Tiagarsuppmen Admin replied
355 weeks ago